Let us set a few examples: That particular Buddhist sect claims many more members in Hawaii than does the Mormon church. If gay marriage is legalized, homosexuality would be promoted in the public schools. How about Deuteronomy Many religions in the world object to the issue of gay marriages on the grounds of morality.
Indeed, Rock Hudson was considered the very archtype of a masculine man. You can look through the Wikipedia article dedicated to this topic and see the real statistics.
The gay movement argument for same sex marriage is basically founded on the norm of formal equality. Which is precisely what happened in Hardwick vs. The easiest way to counter the slippery-slope fallacy is to simply point out that gay marriage has been tried in many places in the world for many years, including the United States itself, and none of the dire effects insistently predicted have yet to occur in any of those locations to any significant degree.
In other words, we have a long-running "experiment" to examine for its results -- which have uniformly been positive. In other words, this is like arguing that you should not expect legal protection from being persecuted because you are a Mormon or a Catholic; the solution to such disadvantage or persecution is simple: Economic benefits that the proponents of gay marriages cite include increased revenue as a result of additional marriages through marriage taxes Stockland Two men or women marrying therefore have resulted to a controversy where people have differing opinions.
Same-sex marriage would threaten the institution of marriage. What, then, to do? By allowing people to marry? Those against this kind of marriage think that same sex couples should not be allowed to adopt children.
Immorality For many people, same-sex marriages are immoral; they say it destructs the conception of marriage at all and leads to depravation of nation. International married couples can usually pick which country in which to reside, with barely a thought about the law.
If our partners are arrested, we can be compelled to testify against them or provide evidence against them, which legally married couples are not forced to do.
Other players were the usual suspects, the Catholic church, several of the more conservative Protestant denominations, the American Family Association, Focus On The Family, their various political subsidiary groups, and a whole host of smaller right-wing political and religious organizations, including a few out-right hate groups.
A man making love to another man betrays everything that is masculine. It gets out the homophobe vote quite reliably, so when right-wing candidates are behind in the polls, a gay marriage ballot measure is often used as a way to also raise the participation and push a right-winger into office when he would otherwise have lost.
These are all civil rights issues that have nothing whatever to do with the ecclesiastical origins of marriage; they are matters that have become enshrined in state and federal laws over the years in many ways that exclude us from the rights that legally married couples enjoy and consider their constitutional right.
The core cause of this fear is the result of the fact that most virulent, even violent homophobes are themselves repressed sexually, often with same sex attractions. Supreme Court for at least a generation.
That can only mean fewer divorces and better, more wholesome family life. So you would have freedom of choice, of choosing what kind of marriage to participate in -- something more than what you have now.
Granting gays the right to marry is a "special" right. It is really worth expressing them in your essay, as they can provide really valid explanation of why your own position.
Therefore, by allowing same sex marriage sanctity of marriage would be violated. Proponents and gays movement fight for legal right to marriage in order to ensure that all citizens enjoy full human rights.
If one believes in religious freedom, the recognition that opposition to gay marriage is based on religious arguments is reason enough to discount this argument.Nov 09, · Same-Sex Marriage Argumentative Essay 09 November by they have own duties and surely they should have a right to choose whom to marry.
So, it is fair to make gay marriages legal. Respect Minority. there are several arguments that show legalizing in bad light/5(K).
AGAINST Gay Marriage: FOR Gay Marriage: 1. MARRIAGE IS FOR A MAN AND A WOMAN. Critics argue that marriage is defined as the union of a man and a woman, and to change that would go against natural law and risk undermining both the institution of marriage and the family’s role in holding society together.
Sam Isaacson wrote an article analyzing the opinion of the gay community on legalizing same sex marriages.
It is somewhat of a controversial issue with the gay community whether or not marriage is a good thing. This research will analyze the arguments for and against gay marriages and the religious view of same sex marriages. Denying same sex couples the legal rights to get married could mean denial of basic rights to enjoy the human benefits.
Some will say that not legalizing same-sex marriages is against a person's constitutional right of freedom, others say that it goes against the laws of nature and would be "antifamily." Essays Related to Legalizing Gay Marriages.
1. Gay marriage. When arguments arise on the gay marriage subject, usually the first person to speak out. An Analysis Of Arguments Against Gay Marriage Philosophy Essay. Print Reference this. Published: 23rd March, A common argument against legalizing same-sex marriages is that doing so would undermine the institution of marriage.
For some reason, a marriage between members of the same sex is a self-contradiction and, if their unions are.Download